Legal Opinion

United States v. Bryson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 3, 1976No. Crim. A. 76-27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

STAPLETON, District Judge:

This is a prosecution in which defendant John Bryson and, originally, two co-defendants were charged with “pursu[ing], huntpng], tak[ing] and killing] migratory game birds ... by the aid of baiting and on or over a baited area. . . . ” in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i). Trial was to the Court.

After presentation of the prosecution’s evidence, judgments of acquittal were entered respecting John Bryson’s co-defendants because there was insufficient evidence to establish that they had hunted “on or over” a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M. Allen Clemons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  2. Renwick L. Allen and Courtney Vallentine v. Lawrence J. Merovka, L. J. Dugger, and Robert G. KinghornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Alexis Javier AngueiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Robert WulffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Corbin Farm ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
  5. United States v. CatlettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API