Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 15, 1990No. 89-465PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (Morrill, J.) of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, I. On appeal, the defendant argues that the evidence *705presented at trial was constitutionally insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

The testimony at trial described the following sequence of events. On the evening of March 13, 1988, the victim was walking down the street in Newport. A car stopped beside her. It was driven by the defendant and occupied by his friends, Russell Newcomb and James Shampney, all of whom had been drinking alcoholic beverages.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. State v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. McAveniaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. State v. LovelySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HennesseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Rodriguez v. WebbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. State v. CrottySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. State v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API