Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Lind

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2006No. 03 30074; A126809PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Husband appeals from a general judgment dissolving his marriage. In particular, he disputes the trial court’s division of two items of marital property (an investment account and a house), the amount and duration of spousal support that the court ordered him to pay wife, and the court’s ruling that he had to pay $3,206 toward wife’s costs and attorney fees. We modify the property division and otherwise affirm.

I. FACTS

On de novo review, we find the following facts, giving due deference to the trial court’s implied credibility findings. ORS 19.415(3); Tomos and Tomos, 165 Or App 82, 87, 995 P2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. In re Van WinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. In Re the Marriage of HixsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. In re the Marriage of UwimanaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In Re the Marriage of WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API