In re Van Winkel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.
*807Wife appeals from a general judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. She challenges the trial court's division of the marital property, contending that the court erred in awarding husband one-half of the equity in the house that she bought before the marriage. We conclude that the trial court applied the correct methodology and that the resulting award fell within the range of legally permissible outcomes. We therefore affirm.
The salient facts are largely undisputed. In June 2008, before the parties married, wife moved into a house that husband owned in California. For the two years that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In re the Marriage of LindCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- In re the Marriage of FrancisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Craven and CravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- In re MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- In re SauterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Sherman and ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.