State v. Margolis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Appellees sought and obtained a declaratory judgment in district court holding that they did not violate State statutes, prohibiting monopolies, trusts, or conspiracies in restraint of trade, by operating a merchandising conception designed to avoid the restraints of a penal statute making it unlawful for any person to sell certain goods on both of the two consecutive days of Saturday and Sunday.
The State of Texas, defendant below, has appealed from this judgment and contends that appellees are engaged in a monopoly or trust that fixes, maintains, affects, or controls prices…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- California Products, Inc. v. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
- Boswell v. HandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Ainsworth v. Oil City Brass WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Renfro v. ShropshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Lone Starr Multi Theatres, Inc. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Airport Coach Service, Inc. v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Conte v. Greater Houston BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.