Legal Opinion

Romanelli v. Bonvouloir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Beacon, dated April 7, 1983, which granted a use variance to intervenor Armand Ninnie, doing business as Central Construction Co., petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered July 15, 1983, which dismissed the petition, fl Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, petition granted and determination granting intervenor a use variance annulled, and application denied. H In order to obtain a use variance, there must be a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Barby Land Corp. v. ZiegnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carriage Works Enterprises, Ltd. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Tharp v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Abbey Island Park, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Malrite T.V. of New York, Inc. v. LicciardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API