Legal Opinion · Dissent

Malrite T.V. of New York, Inc. v. Licciardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1986Published

1DissentBoomer, J.

Respondent landowners, having knowingly acquired the land for a use prohibited by the zoning ordinance, could not thereafter have a variance on the ground of special hardship (see, Matter of Clark v Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 NY 86, cert denied 340 US 933; Matter of Romanelli v Bonvouloir, 102 AD2d 872; Repicci v Sharpe, 96 AD2d 727, lv denied 60 NY2d 556; Ames v Palma, 52 AD2d 1077; Matter of Kenyon v Quinones, 43 AD2d 125, 127; Matter of Everhart v Johnston, 30 AD2d 608; 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 23.30 [3d ed]). Moreover, the landowners failed to submit sufficient…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Kenyon v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Repicci v. SharpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Romanelli v. BonvouloirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API