Malrite T.V. of New York, Inc. v. Licciardi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentBoomer, J.
Respondent landowners, having knowingly acquired the land for a use prohibited by the zoning ordinance, could not thereafter have a variance on the ground of special hardship (see, Matter of Clark v Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 NY 86, cert denied 340 US 933; Matter of Romanelli v Bonvouloir, 102 AD2d 872; Repicci v Sharpe, 96 AD2d 727, lv denied 60 NY2d 556; Ames v Palma, 52 AD2d 1077; Matter of Kenyon v Quinones, 43 AD2d 125, 127; Matter of Everhart v Johnston, 30 AD2d 608; 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 23.30 [3d ed]). Moreover, the landowners failed to submit sufficient…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Kenyon v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Repicci v. SharpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Romanelli v. BonvouloirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.