Legal Opinion
In re Ferrari
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1934No. Crim. No. 1824PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
A complaint was filed against the petitioner in the Justice’s Court of San Jose Township, Santa Clara County, purporting to charge a violation of State Liquor Control Act, Statutes of 1933, chapter 658, page 1697. He was arrested and tried before the court, a jury having been waived. The trial court found him guilty and entered a judgment of conviction. The petitioner appealed to the superior court and the judgment was affirmed. Thereafter he applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction.
The complaint alleges that “ ... on or about…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. LamanuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Halbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930