Legal Opinion

Hovbilt, Inc. v. Township of Howell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 22, 1994PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This appeal requires that we consider the scope of the Correction of Errors statute, N.J.S.A. 54:51A-7. The specific error in issue arises from the misplacing by the Howell Township tax assessor’s office of the farmland-assessment application filed by Hovbilt, Inc. (Hovbilt), resulting in a higher property tax *601assessment than would have been imposed if the property had been assessed as farmland.

The Tax Court, in an unreported opinion, held that the error was not correctable under the statute. A divided panel of the Appellate Division affirmed.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Levin v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Tp. of Andover v. KymerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. New Jersey State League of Municipalities v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris PlainsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Stryker Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Binkowski v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. MacLeod v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API