Legal Opinion
Binkowski v. State
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 24, 1999PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
731 A.2d 64 (1999)
322 N.J. Super. 359
Gloria BINKOWSKI, Henry Furst and Robert Kelman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 17, 1999.
Decided June 24, 1999.
Anna E. Charlton of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, for plaintiffs-appellants (Gary L. Francione, attorney; Ms. Charlton, on the brief).
Barbara Conklin, Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-respondent (Peter Verniero, Attorney General, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Conklin, on the brief).
Before…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tenafly Eruv Ass'n v. Borough of TenaflyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Tenafly Eruv Association, Inc. v. The Borough Of TenaflyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Jenkins v. DOCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Data Informatics, Inc. v. Amerisource PartnersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Green Township Education Ass'n v. RoweNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.