Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Muscatine Produce & Pure Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — Hon. L. J. Horan] Judge. Action in equity to rescind tbe sale of stock in defendant corporation. There was a decree for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The defendant corporation was organized about November, 1909, with $50,000 paid-up capital, and proceeded to build its plant. It did some business, in a small way prior to July 4, 1910, but had its opening on that date. About June 26, 1910, plaintiff called to see what defendant was paying for milk and cream. She and her husband were *172living on a farm and had no experience in investments in cor-' poration stocks. About July 13, 1910, some of the promoters or incorporators, being dissatisfied with the condition of the business, had a special report or statement made, from which it appeared that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. WeareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Smith v. BrokerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Wilcox v. Iowa Wesleyan UniversitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Mohler v. CarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Severson v. KockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alpen v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Farnsworth v. Muscatine Produce & Pure Ice Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Leach v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Baumchen v. DonahoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Kimmel v. Eastern Coal & Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API