Legal Opinion

People v. Ostrander

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from court of oyer and terminer, Ulster county. Indictment against James E. Ostrander for perjury. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the indictment, the people appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the court below sustaining a demurrer to the indictment herein. Code Crim. Proc. §§ 275, 276, 284, and 285, provide the tests for determining the sufficiency of an indictment. “It must contain a plain and concise statement of the act constituting the crime, without unnecessary repetition, and it is sufficient if the act charged as the crime is plainly set forth with such a degree of certainty as to enable the court to pronounce judgment upon a conviction, according to the right of the case; and no indictment is insufficient, by reason of any imperfection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. . WeldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. People v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. OstranderNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API