White v. Madison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from- the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. This is an action to recover damages for an unlawful arrest and imprisonment brought against the city marshal of the city of Enid, and the sureties, on his official bond. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Error from- the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. This is an action to recover damages for an unlawful arrest and imprisonment brought against the city marshal of the city of Enid, and the sureties, on his official bond. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. It appears that on the 7th day of August, 1901, the defendant, W. E. White, was duly elected, qualified and acting marshal of the city of Enid, Garfield county, O. T., and that C. B. Utsler and P. J. G'oulddng were the sureties on his official bond. It also…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Gillette, J.:
No questions of error are presented by the record in this case except such as arise upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial, and the motion for a new trial relates exclusively to errors arising upon the final trial, resulting in a judgment against the defendants jointly.
The first four assignments of error presented in the brief for the plaintiff in error relate exclusively to questions of error arising upon the first trial of the case. The action as originally brought against the three defendants was upon a joint obligation. At the conclusion of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Caddo Nat. Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ramsey Oil Co. v. BurbageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Thompson v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933