Legal Opinion

In re Burke

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided March 25, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Intervention of John Deere Plow Company. Petition to review referee’s order, by intervener.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, District Judge.

This case is presented by a petition to review the findings of Hon. A. H. MacDonell, referee in bankruptcy, *995and is brought by the John Deere Plow Company, who seek recaption of certain cultivators and farming implements, found among the bankrupt’s assets. The petitioner claims title, and the right to retake these articles, by virtue of contracts which it is insisted are merely conditional sales. The contracts were in writing, but they were not recorded, nor were they attested by any witness. The questions here are whether such contracts are effective to retain the title…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Fullington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Cottrell & Sons v. Merchants & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Conder v. Holleman & BallardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Rhode Island Locomotive Works v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re HargroveDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1945
  2. In re W. J. Marshall Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API