Legal Opinion

Conder v. Holleman & Ballard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Judgments. Liens. Sales. Contracts. Records. Practice in Supreme Court. Before Judge Harris. Campbell Superior Court. February Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

This case was tried below by the judge, without a jury,. on an agreed state of facts, and the property levied on found not subject. The material facts are these: Conder,. in 1879, obtained a judgment against Hudson, and had a fi.fa. issued from that judgment levied on this property,. one black mare mule' and a two horse wagon, as the property of the defendant, on the 18th day of October, 1882. Holleman & Ballard claimed .the property. Their claim was based on these facts : On January 2d, 1882, they sold the property levied on to Hudson, and took his note for the purchase…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. American Law Book Co. v. Brunswick Crosstie & Creosoting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Fountain v. FountainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. In re Atlanta News Pub. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1907
  5. Tremere v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API