Legal Opinion
Stogsdill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 10, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000762; No. 5271PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
Richard Stogsdill appeals the Administrative Law Court’s (ALC’s) order affirming the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services’ (DHHS’s) decision approving the reduction in services to him. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Stogsdill is a Medicaid-eligible man receiving services under the South Carolina Intellectual Disabilities/Related Disabilities (ID/RD) Waiver (Waiver).1 His mental capacity is normal, but because of premature birth, he suffers from significant physical disabilities that require aid in nearly every activity of daily living.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- M.R. v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fisher v. Oklahoma Health Care AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joseph v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Stogsdill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Myers v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Stogsdill v. SCDHHSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016