Joseph v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ACTING JUSTICE TOAL:
This is the latest in a longstanding disagreement regarding how the practice of physical therapy should be regulated in South Carolina. The South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy (the Board) has sided with members of the profession who desire to prevent physical therapists (PTs) from providing treatment as direct employees of physicians. The Board has long sought to require PTs to provide their services directly to patients or through a practice group of PTs. However, other licensed healthcare professionals in South Carolina, such as occupational therapists, speech…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Hearn; Concurrence · Pleicones.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Department of Transportation v. Association of American RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buchanan v. S.C. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- McIntyre v. Sec. Comm'r of S.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Myers v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Opternative, Inc. v. South Carolina Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- Retail Services & Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.