United States v. Mosley
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
2Per curiam
In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that the military judge erred by allowing the trial defense counsel to argue for a punitive discharge without ensuring on the record that the accused specifically concurred in such argument. Disagreeing, we affirm.
Tried by a military judge sitting alone, the accused was found guilty of various offenses under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was correctly advised of his rights in allocution. Subsequently, the defense counsel indicated that the accused “has concluded that a bad conduct discharge would be…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WeatherfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. WorrellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. SchwartzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. FreelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. WillisU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1979
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WeikelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. BoyceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982