Legal Opinion

Schmoll v. Creecy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 10, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 N.J. Super. 126 (1969)

249 A.2d 3

ALAN R. SCHMOLL, ESQUIRE, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CORNELIUS PAYNTER, SR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ROSHIER G. CREECY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 12, 1968.

Decided January 10, 1969.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

Mr. Walter Gollub argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Charles A. Cohen argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Bogue Electric Co. v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Hammond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Adams v. County of AtlanticSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DuvaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. In Re Estate of SharpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. McBride v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  4. Debra Warren v. Christopher P. MuenzenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  5. In Re Estate of SharpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API