Joyce Goolsby, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. W. Michael Blumenthal, as Secretary of the Department of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
There having been a rehearing of this case en banc, it is the judgment of the court that the judgment of the district court from which this appeal is taken be and the same is AFFIRMED.
The en banc court adopts as its opinion all of the dissenting panel opinion of Judge Homer Thornberry except for the final portion thereof, designated paragraph IV.1
The panel dissenting opinion adopted by the en banc court is attached as an appendix.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX. Paragraph IV of the panel dissent was devoted to an issue which would be appropriate were the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Briggs v. North Muskegon Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- United States v. BarredaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Joyce Goolsby, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. W. Michael Blumenthal, as Secretary of the Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.