Legal Opinion
Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 25, 1940No. 788PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The. motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325; Lewis v. Mayor, 290 U. S. 585.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lemir Realty Corp. v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- New York Tennis Associates v. Town of VestalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Turgeon v. Buffalo Common CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Hausman v. Common Council of City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Frederico v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.