Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Carter & Parr Mobile, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 20, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., sustained as a result of a dog bite, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered September *58727, 1994, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We reject the plaintiffs’ contention that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The jury verdict in favor of the defendant should not be set aside and judgment granted to the plaintiffs unless there is no valid line of reasoning by which the jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lynch v. NacewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Greenberg v. BehlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hayden v. SieniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chepel v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mesiti v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Aprea v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Robinson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kravitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.