Legal Opinion
Credle v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-03610-AWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
On October 4, 2012, the Court held a hearing to address Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend their Complaint, Doc. No. 76, Defendant United States of America’s Motion for a More Definite Statement, *528Doc. No. 69, and Plaintiffs’ standing to bring this action. Counsel for Plaintiffs conceded that Hazel Credle was not a proper party to this action. Counsel argued, however, that Plaintiffs Stacy Greene1 and Lynetta Jones were proper parties despite not being court-appointed personal representatives, and cited case law in support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Frederico Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd. And Djakarta Lloyd, P.N.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- John Futch, Individually and as Personal Representative of Cecil Futch v. Midland Enterprises, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Alexander Alcabasa v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Calton, IV v. Zapata LexingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Santos v. America Cruise Ferries, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- Energetic Tank, Inc. v. UnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024