Legal Opinion

John Futch, Individually and as Personal Representative of Cecil Futch v. Midland Enterprises, Inc., Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1973No. 72-2900PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

While the who-has-standing-to-sue-un der-Moragne question which this cause presents is novel, the district court’s answer — the personal representative of the deceased — is clearly correct.

Cecil Futch drowned when the towboat and barge on which he was employed as an able-bodied seaman capsized. The vessels were owned by defendants, Midland Enterprises, Inc. and The Ohio River Company, and bareboat chartered to and operated by defendant, Red Circle Transport Company. For a consideration of 75,000 dollars, Futch’s widow and Administratrix executed a receipt and release…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dennis v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Futch v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1972

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Beiswenger Enterprises Corp. v. CarlettaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Elaine Jones v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Warnie Lee Ivy, Cross-Appellants v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Porche v. Gulf Mississippi Marine CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975
  5. Canal Barge Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API