Legal Opinion

Bush v. Coult

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1979No. 15680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company (hereinafter “Commonwealth”) appeals from a judgment in favor of the Lockhart Company (hereinafter “Lock-hart”) for losses incurred due to a title defect in real property insured under a title policy issued by Commonwealth.

The original plaintiff in this case, Gus-tave E. Bush (hereinafter “Bush”), filed suit against defendant Mickey M. Coult (hereinafter “Coult”), and others, including Lock-hart. Bush was successful in proving the deed of conveyance to Coult was a forgery, and thus quieted the title to the land in question.

Lockhart had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Empire Development Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Research Loan & Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Owen v. OwenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Griffeth v. ZumbrennenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Research Loan & Investment Corp. v. Lawyers Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. L. Smirlock Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Van Winkle v. Transamerica Title Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API