Legal Opinion
Bradshaw Bros. & Co. v. Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1903No. Nos. 13,421—(99)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Action in the district court for Bamsey county to recover $985.57 upon a policy of fire insurance. The case was tried before O. B. Lewis, J., who found in favor of defendant. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover for a fire loss on a policy of the standard form issued to the plaintiff by defendant. The defense was a cancellation of the policy before the loss occurred.
The provisions of the policy as to a cancellation thereof, so-far as here material, were these:
“The company also reserves the right after giving written notice to the insured * * * and tendering to the insured a ratable portion of the premium, to cancel this policy as to all risks subsequent to the expiration of ten days from such notice.”
The findings of fact by the trial judge as to the alleged cancel*335lation of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Hauter v. Coeur D'Alene Antimony Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Pelaggi Co. v. Orient Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Northern Pine Crating Co v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.