Leonard Express, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
We are to determine whether the deliberate movement of freight by a common carrier from one state to another and then a return to the state of origin for delivery for the sole purpose of creating a technical interstate passage is a legitimate and appropriate exercise of interstate authorities granted by the Interstate Commerce Commission.1 The ICC held it was not; the carrier, Leonard Express, Inc., has appealed.2
Leonard Express has been issued no rights by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) for operations between the Pittsburgh and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- ILLINOIS CENT. & C. RR v. Inter. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Mechling v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Union Mechling Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- QBE Ins. Co. v. P & F CONTAINERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Schenck Transportation, Inc. v. Inter-County Motor Coach, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.