Legal Opinion

Houtchens v. Mercer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1930No. 5683PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an original petition for mandamus instituted in the Supreme Court by S. F. Houtchens, Relator, against the Honorable James E. Mercer, Judge of the 67th Judicial District Court of •Tarrant County, Texas, Respondent, seeking to compel the Respondent to fix the amount of a supersedeas bond in a certain case now pending on appeal in the Court of Civil Appeals at Fort Worth.

It is disclosed by the record that Relator was an attorney at law, duly licensed under the laws of Texas and engaged in the practice of his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Williams v. PounsTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Fort Worth & New Orleans Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Yett v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ex Parte G.O. KimbroughTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Tarrant CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API