Kling v. City Council of City of Newport Beach
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying the appellants’ application for a writ of mandate ordering the city council of Newport Beach to approve a proposed subdivision.
The appellants are the owners of Lot 140 in a tract known as “Shore Cliff” tract. There are 142 lots in this tract, of which 138 lots are subject to a tract restriction providing that only one single family residence may be situated upon each lot. Four lots, including Lot 140 were specifically excepted from that restriction. These four lots form the northerly end of the tract, and face the state highway on one side. Lot 140 is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaylord v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Roussey v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Wood v. City Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by9 opinions
- Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Arroyo Vista Partners v. County of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Broward County v. Narco Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Baltimore Planning Commission v. Victor Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.