Legal Opinion

Flickinger v. Wrenn Investment Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1916No. L. A. No. 3616. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, Wrenn Investment Company, a corporation, and O.C. Heck, were interested as stockholders in the Owners Garage and Supply Company. To increase the working capital of this company and to secure the services of plaintiff, they induced him to purchase twenty-five shares of the stock of the Owners Garage and Supply Company at par and to take employment in that company as manager for the period of one year, agreeing in writing that they (the defendants) would "at the option of the party of the second part (plaintiff), at the expiration of one year from the date hereof purchase from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Smith v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons' Co. v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flickinger v. HeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Veterans' Welfare Board v. BurtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API