Apj Associates, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal of a grant of summary judgment. Plaintiff-Appellant APJ Associates (“AP”), a manufacturer’s representative firm, signed a series of agreements with Defendant-Appellee North American Philips Corp. (“Philips”), a microprocessor supplier. After Philips terminated the agreement, AP brought suit, claiming it is entitled to sales commissions due to fraudulent inducement, promissory estoppel, and the Michigan Sales Representative Act, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.2961. For the reasons set forth, this court AFFIRMS the district court.
PROCEDURAL AND…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Tom Hammon v. Dhl Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Novak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barber v. Smh (Us), IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Diamond Computer Systems, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- McGuire v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Sivak v. United Parcel Service Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Muqtadir v. Micro Contacts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.