Legal Opinion

Cranmer v. Kohn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Edmunds county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action upon contract for services by Isaac W. Cranmer against Joseph Kohn and another. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This action is founded upon a written contract, by the terms of which plaintiff was tobe employed by defendants as a traveling salesman from January 1 to December 31, 1888. If his sales during the year reached $50,000, he was to receive $2,200; if they exceeded $55,000, he was to receive in addition 6 per cent, on the excess; and if they did not reach $50,000, he was to receive seven and three-fifths per cent, upon the sales actually made. And he was to be allowed not more than $1,600 for traveling expenses-while traveling in the service of defendants. Plaintiff was engaged in the service of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C. Aultman & Co. v. SiglingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wright v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cranmer v. KohnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bem v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. First National Bank v. Dakota Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sogn v. KoetzleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Murtha v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Thomas v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API