Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Korman Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-1070PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, Senior District Judge.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G) brought this declaratory judgment action to obtain a ruling whether it and two other insurance companies, CIGNA Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Cigna) 1 and National Union Fire Insurance Company (National Union), must provide The Korman Corporation (Korman) with coverage for claims against Korman in two underlying lawsuits currently pending in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The two underlying lawsuits are captioned Smalls, et al. v. The Korman Corporation, et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gene & Harvey Builders, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Aardvark Associates, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aardvark Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Lower Paxon Township v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- James River Insurance v. Ground Down Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Employers Insurance Of Wausau v. Crown Cork & Seal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.