Legal Opinion

Edward B. Spencer v. Stuart Sherman, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 17, 2025No. 1:21-cv-01551Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD B. SPENCER, Case No.: 1:21-cv-01551-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 14 STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 33) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Plaintiff Edward B. Spencer is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 19 failure to protect claim against Defendant Lopez. 20 I.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API