Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Swisher
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1998No. 23946PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed objections with this Court to the findings and recommendations of a Hearing Panel Subcommittee (“Panel”) of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board, a body created by the Supreme Court of Appeals to govern the professional conduct of lawyers within West Virginia. The Panel concluded that C. Crady Swisher (“Swisher”) did not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.
The ODC asks this Court to find that Swisher violated Rules 8.1 and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, to suspend Swisher’s law license for an appropriate period of time, and to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. HalesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BlevinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. DutyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of C. Crady SwisherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.