Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Blevins
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 2008No. 33281PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: 1
This lawyer disciplinary proceeding concerning the respondent, Mark A. Blevins, is before this Court upon the Report of the Hearing Panel Subcommittee of the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board and the Subcommittee’s recommended sanctions: (1) that respondent Blevins’ license to practice law in the State of West Virginia be suspended for a period of eighteen months; (2) that, upon reinstatement, his private practice be supervised for a period of two years; (3) that respondent Blevins complete nine hours of Continuing Legal Education in ethics in addition to such ethics hours…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ira M. HaughtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF L. Dante DiTRAPANOWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- In The Matter of: Jaymie Godwin Wilfong, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Wendelyn A. ElswickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.