Legal Opinion

Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Menapace

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1901No. 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

Only matters of practice are involved in this hearing. Menapace brought suit against the fuel and iron company to recover damages for personal injuries. He was allowed to prosecute as a poor person. On the conclusion of his case the defendant company moved for a nonsuit for insufficiency of proof. The matter was argued and the court, as the bill of exceptions recites, commenced to state his conclusions about the matter, sugg'esting to the plaintiff’s counsel that probably he better take a voluntary nonsuit. Accepting the suggestion, the plaintiff asked for a nonsuit which was granted. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Felt v. AmidonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. McArthur v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  4. Livergood v. RhoadesIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Sharp v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. JUDICIAL COURTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API