In re the Arbitration between Holliday & Samuels
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentShientag, J.
Appellant contracted to charter a yacht from respondent for $20,000 and made a $5,000 down payment. Appellant failed to take the yacht and, pursuant to the provisions of the charter, appellant and respondent proceeded to arbitration. Each of the parties appointed an arbitrator and the two arbitrators so chosen selected a third, Ryder. At the proceedings, the three arbitrators heard witnesses, and examined exhibits and briefs. The arbitrators were, however, unable to agree on a decision. At Ryder’s suggestion, the arbitrators appointed by appellant and respondent, at the close of the hearings,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In Re the Arbitration Between Springs Cotton Mills & Buster Boy Suit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Marchant & Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re the Arbitration between Snaider & Manu Hoffner Fur Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.