Legal Opinion

Deutsche Bank, AG v. Vik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 2016No. 813 161257/13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered February 4, 2015, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and to cancel a notice of pendency, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court correctly found that it had personal jurisdiction over defendant Sebastian Holdings, Inc. (SHI) pursuant to CPLR 303 and over defendants Alexander Vik, C.M. Beatrice, Inc. (Beatrice) and CSCSNE trust based on the well pleaded allegations that SHI and Vik are alter egos and that Vik, Beatrice and CSCSNE trust are alter egos. It also correctly found that New York law applies to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Serio v. Ardra InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Harvardsky Prumyslovy Holding v. KozenyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 28, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deutsche Bank, AG v. VikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API