Legal Opinion

State v. Carney

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2008No. 33522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Wanda Carney and Betty Jarvis seek to have this Court set aside their convictions for one count each of obstructing a police officer and conspiracy to obstruct a police officer on grounds that insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to sustain the convictions. While the obstruction statute under which they were convicted 1 requires conduct that is either forcible or illegal which operates to hinder or obstruct the official acts of a police officer, Appellants argue that none of the acts they were accused of committing were accomplished with force or were illegal in nature. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Wilmoth v. GustkeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tiffanie Hupp v. State Trooper Seth CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. Jarvis v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICEWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. United States v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
  5. Jafary v. WardDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API