Legal Opinion

Brobst v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Schuylkill Products, Inc.)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Sean Brobst (Claimant) petitions for review of the November 12, 2002, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant Claimant’s claim petition but to suspend Claimant’s wage loss benefits for refusing to perform an available job. We affirm.

Claimant began working as a laborer for Schuylkill Products, Inc. (Employer) in September of 1994. On December 17, 1996, while Claimant was attempting to position a large metal “A” frame with a crowbar, Claimant lost his grip on the crowbar and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. PEC Contracting Engineers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Crowell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Chavis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R. Soose v. WCAB (PSC Metals, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API