Legal Opinion
National Furniture Co. v. William Spiegelman & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion "by the defendant to quash the service of a summons.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This is a motion by the defendant to quash the service of a summons, on the ground such service was unauthorized, and conferred no jurisdiction on this court to render a personal judgment against the defendant.
*54The facts disclosed by the moving and opposing affidavits are, that the defendant is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania and located in the city of Philadelphia; that this action is to recover the purchase price of certain furniture claimed to have been sold by the plaintiff to the defendant at Jamestown, N. Y.; that the purchase in question was made through…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Etter v. Early Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Meyer v. Sachs Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Seaboard Fruit Distributors, Inc. v. Carlton-Moore Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922