Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1986No. Crim. 14524PublishedCited by 19 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

In this case we consider the appropriate remedy on appeal when a jury, which has not been instructed on the point, improperly convicts a thief of both the crime of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), and the crime of receiving the property stolen in the burglary. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. 1.) We hold that the appellate remedy in that circumstance is to reverse and vacate the receiving stolen property conviction and affirm the burglary conviction.

After a jury trial defendant Jimmy Lee Stewart was convicted of six counts of first degree residential burglary, and seven counts of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. JaramilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. CejaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API