People v. Stewart
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
In this case we consider the appropriate remedy on appeal when a jury, which has not been instructed on the point, improperly convicts a thief of both the crime of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), and the crime of receiving the property stolen in the burglary. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. 1.) We hold that the appellate remedy in that circumstance is to reverse and vacate the receiving stolen property conviction and affirm the burglary conviction.
After a jury trial defendant Jimmy Lee Stewart was convicted of six counts of first degree residential burglary, and seven counts of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. JaramilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. CejaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.