People v. Ceja
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
The Penal Code specifies that a defendant may not be convicted of stealing and receiving the same property. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).) In this case, the trial court failed to instruct on this point, and the jury convicted defendant of both petty theft and receiving the property he had stolen. A divided Court of Appeal reversed the petty theft conviction. The majority reasoned that the “greater” felony offense of receiving stolen property took precedence over the “lesser” misdemeanor theft offense.
Section 496(a) itself is inconclusive as to which conviction should stand…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- McMillin Albany LLC v. Superior Court of Kern Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Munoz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. OrozcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. FonteOregon Supreme Court · 2018
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.