Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. Brannan Turpentine Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WARING, District Judge.
This matter comes before me on a motion to dismiss made on behalf of the defendants upon the grounds set forth in the notice of motion; and at the same time the case was considered from the standpoint of a pretrial conference for the purpose of determining and defining the issues if the motion to dismiss was nof granted.
The first ground for dismissal points out that the amended complaint alleges that certain lands were acquired by the defendant company and subsequently conveyed to the individual defendant, Ida Mae Brannan, and that all of said lands were covered by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. Brannan Turpentine Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942