Legal Opinion

Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. Brannan Turpentine Co.

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1942No. 522PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WARING, District Judge.

This cause again comes before me on motions in regard to the pleadings. In an opinion filed by me on April 2, 1942, 46 F. Supp. 271, I held that the amended complaint set forth two causes of action, namely: (1) That certain lands now standing in the name of the defendant, Ida Mae Bran-nan, were covered by certain mortgages heretofore given by Brannan Turpentine Company to plaintiff because the mortgages contained language covering after-acquired property; and (2) that the said lands standing in the name of Ida Mae Brannan had been acquired and paid for with funds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. White v. Holland Furnace Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939
  4. Francis Marion Hotel v. ChiccoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. McCaslan v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hearst v. American Newspapers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API