Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. Van Winkle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1964No. 4192PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

This is a negligence case. Appellant, the widow of Wesley Dawkins, brought the suit for herself and as next friend for her three minor children to recover damages for the loss of her husband while in the employ of appellee on appellee’s ranch in Leon County, and while her husband was in the discharge of his duties in the course of his employment. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence defendant presented his motion for directed verdict, which motion was overruled. Thereafter the defendant refused to tender any testimony and rested and renewed his motion for directed verdict,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Union Stockyards v. PeelerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. D-Bar Ranch v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Carson v. KnightTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dunnings v. Castro, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  3. Lewis v. Great Southwest CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Labaj v. VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  5. Dawkins v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API