Legal Opinion

United States v. Leyde & Leyde

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 16, 1950No. 4002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The United States has brought suit under section 19 of the Contract Settlement Act *258of 1944, 58 Stat. pp. 649-671, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 101-126, against the defendants. The purpose of the suit is to recover damages and penalties for alleged fraudulent claims submitted to the Maritime Commission, an agency of the United States, with respect to amounts claimed to be payable to the defendants and to an alleged subcontractor by reason of the cancellation of certain contracts for the manufacture and equipment of life rafts.

The main objectives of the Act as stated in section 1 are,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Lalone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dugan & McNamara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Arlington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. United States v. DinersteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  4. Arlington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Arlington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API