Trustees of the First Baptist Church v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment at special term.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,
Rosekrans, J.
There was no ambiguity • in the words “ permanent policy,” and the judge properly excluded evidence to show what was their meaning. - They were correctly assumed to mean, as was insisted by the *449plaintiff, an insurance from year to year, and until terminated by an express notice by one of the parties to the contract to the other. The words of a contract are to be regarded as used in their common and ordinary sense, unless they are shown to have acquired and to have been used in a technical sense. No such evidence was given or offered in relation to the use of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Shank v. Glens Falls InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- A. B. Cleveland Co. v. A. C. Nellis Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- People v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1872