Legal Opinion
State v. Staten
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1989No. 89-691PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
In its information, the State charged Shawn J. Staten with unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (cocaine). See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(1)(a) (Cum. Supp. 1988). Staten filed a motion to suppress the physical evidence (cocaine), see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-822 (Reissue 1985), and her custodial statements, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-115 (Reissue 1985). Because the district court for Douglas County sustained Staten’s suppression motions, the State appeals and seeks review by a judge of this court, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-824 and 29-116 (Reissue 1985).
On the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. StatenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. VerlingNebraska Supreme Court · 2005